![]() The court noted the nonpunitive interest at stake: the security of the federal government’s information systems. Kaspersky failed to adequately allege that Congress enacted a bill of attainder. Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the suit. ![]() ![]() Kaspersky sued, arguing that the prohibition constituted an impermissible legislative punishment, a bill of attainder prohibited by the Constitution, Article I, Section 9. 1283) that prohibition in the National Defense Authorization Act. Congress later broadened and codified (131 Stat. In 2017, based on concerns that the Russian government could exploit Kaspersky’s access to federal computers, the Secretary of Homeland Security directed federal agencies to remove the company’s products from government information systems. ![]() Kaspersky, a Russian-based cybersecurity company, provides products and services to customers around the world. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |